Tuesday, 13 November 2012

Argo

 
Director: Ben Affleck
Starring: Ben Affleck, Bryan Cranston, John Goodman, Alan Arkin, Clea DuVall
Certificate: 15
Run-time: 120 minutes


IN SHORT: Argo is captivating and effectively tense throughout. Besides some 'Hollywood' moments that threaten to ruin the realism, it's a thoroughly compelling movie.



Nowadays I'm wary when a film proudly declares itself to be 'based on true events' or 'inspired by a true story'. Usually this is a nonsense claim in an attempt to ground a movie in realism and stir up some publicity. You'd be forgiven for thinking that Argo is another one of these Hollywood movies with false claims of authenticity. The bizarre storyline is, after all, hard to believe. Although sometimes reality is stranger than fiction and Argo is a stunning example of this.


Argo is a fake movie that the CIA/Canadian government used as a cover-up to rescue hostages during the Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979. Tony Mendes (Affleck) is tasked with the unenviable role of entering Tehran under the guise of a Hollywood movie producer. His mission is to rescue six Americans who managed to escape the US embassy building during the riot. In order to get out alive, the group are to disguise themselves as a Canadian film crew seeking locations for their goofy Star Wars knock-off, Argo. With Iran under lock-down and in the midst of revolution, it's seen as a suicide mission but as one character puts it; 'it's the best bad idea we've got'.


Affleck rocks the 70's look with ease.


After some introductory text explaining the Iranian Hostage Crisis, we're thrown immediately into the middle of a siege as hundreds of Iranian civilians storm the US embassy in Tehran. The irate civilians smash their way through the building's windows and fortifications as the people inside can only look on in horror. Once the Iranians are inside, they take sixty people hostage. Six of the embassy employees escape through a back entrance and flee to the Canadian embassy. It's a brutally realistic start to the film but a necessary one as it raises the stakes from the get-go.


Argo's strength is its realism and authenticity. The performances from the cast are earnest and emotionally engaging. During the closing credits, shots from Argo are juxtaposed with real photographs from the actual crisis and the resemblance between the two is uncanny. It's clear that Affleck wanted to portray the events with as much detail and realism as possible and he succeeded. The film's late 70's, early 80's setting also helps to establish the time period, as Affleck walks around in a long trench-coat and far too much facial hair. There's a lot of facial hair in this movie!


Affleck runs through the film cover story with the US embassy employees

Before Mendes gets to Tehran, he is assisted by two Hollywood old-timers; film director John Chambers (John Goodman) and notorious producer Lester Siegel (Alan Arkin). These two help Tony run fake press releases for the fake movie and they even conduct a cast reading in front of television crews and journalists. These scenes add some light comedy and further cement how bonkers the whole operation truly is. Their attention to detail has the whole of Hollywood duped. Mendes even fabricates storyboards for the movie and these prove to play a pivotal role in the groups escape from Tehran.


As with any film adaptation of real life events, there's a little fabrication and a few sprinkles of Hollywood cheese. A rather cliche chase sequence seals the film, as the Iranian revolutionaries finally see through the fake-movie ruse. Some have complained that this final climax is too 'Hollywood' and whilst there are a few coincidences that insure our hero's return home safely, we mustn't forget that this did actually happen! 

All-in-all, Argo is unspectacular but a very well-told, well-acted thriller that's another notch on Affleck's directing resumé. It's not necessarily a film with tremendous re-watch value but there's very little I can fault it for.

8 comments:

  1. If Affleck payed so much attention to details, why did he cast himself instead of a Latino? Jejeje! You're right, it was good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well... he does love himself a bit. I did laugh at the gratuitous shot of him getting changed and showing off his abs in the middle of the film. Completely unnecessary!

      Delete
  2. I hope the text at the beginning scrolls up star wars style... I like the review, keep up the good work.
    p.s I wasn't aware there was such a thing as too much facial hair

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Secretly I'm jealous that my own facial hair grows patchy and not magnificently like Affleck's.

      Thanks for stopping by Rob.

      Delete
  3. It's a good movie, but just not a great one in my opinion. I didn't feel the ever-loving sense of tension going on with the last-act of this movie, but I still think Affleck handled it well. Good review Ben.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know what you mean. I'm not sure I'd watch the film again but everything about is too good for me to score it lower.

      Delete
  4. Argo IS another one of those Hollywood movies with false claims of authenticity. You would be shocked if you read the actual events. (Argo, the movie at Wikepedia has a few of the 100 or so fictions). Other than the embassy takeover and a Swissair plane leaving Iran, almost zero scenes are authentic. I dare anyone to name one between the opening history lesson and the celebrating on the plane that actually happened the way it is depicted or even close. (examples) Mendez had his wife drive him to the airport and a KIwi drove Mendez to Mehrabad airport. An Iranian drove the six in a Canadian embassy van. No bazaar, no table reading, no producer,no use of the Argo portfolio either getting a visa in Bonn or at the airport, no decrepit Hollywood sign. The six weren't even in the Embassy building itself. They were sheltered first by the British. Three scenarios were presented to the group. Canadian Roger Lucy did the fake interrogation. Four stayed at the home of John Sheardown. The maid is fictional, Cranston and Arkin's characters are fictional. On and on...what part of the movie is authentic? The moustaches are spot on!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. You obviously know far more about the real events, than I do. But what I was alluding to in my review is that there are some movies that are sold as being 'true stories' when they 100% aren't. Most possession/demonic horror films for example.

      I found the late 70's setting extremely authentic. It transported me to that time and place. The cars, the suits, the moustaches, the music, the general vibe.

      The film, although Hollywood in its delivery (which I did mention in my review) does stick to the idea that a fake movie named Argo was used to extract Americans from Iran. I think whenever a real life event is adapted into a film, you have to accept some creative licence.

      Thank you for taking the time to read and comment, Bernie.

      Delete